US F-16s head to Vietnam in landmark deal amid China tensions.
Vietnam, a rising power in Southeast Asia, has reportedly taken a significant step toward modernizing its air force by reaching an agreement with the United States to acquire F-16 fighter jets, according to a recent report from the defense publication 19FortyFive.
Citing a former U.S. government official with knowledge of the negotiations and multiple U.S. defense industry representatives, the outlet claims that Hanoi has finalized a deal for at least 24 of the Lockheed Martin-built aircraft, marking what could be the largest defense arrangement between the two nations.
While these claims remain unconfirmed by official statements from Hanoi or Washington, they signal a potential shift in Vietnam’s military strategy as it seeks to replace its aging fleet of Russian-made Sukhoi Su-27 and Su-30 fighters.
This development, set against the backdrop of escalating tensions in the South China Sea and Vietnam’s delicate balancing act between global powers, raises critical questions about the future of its air force and its role in the Indo-Pacific region.
The 19FortyFive report, published on April 18, 2025, suggests that the agreement follows years of quiet negotiations, which intensified after the U.S. lifted its arms embargo on Vietnam in 2016.
The outlet notes that Vietnam is likely to opt for the F-16V Viper, the most advanced variant of the Fighting Falcon, equipped with cutting-edge technology suited for modern warfare. However, the report acknowledges potential hurdles, including U.S. congressional approval and concerns over the reliability of advanced systems like the AIM-120 AMRAAM missile and the AN/APG-83 Active Electronically Scanned Array radar.
These challenges, coupled with Vietnam’s historical reliance on Russian arms, underscore the complexity of transitioning to American platforms. Posts on X from April 22, 2025, echo the 19FortyFive claims, with users citing the agreement as a “major blow” to Russia’s arms trade with Vietnam, though such sentiments lack official corroboration and reflect speculative discourse rather than verified fact.
The F-16V Viper is a fourth-generation multirole fighter renowned for its versatility, affordability, and combat-proven performance. Powered by a General Electric F110-GE-129 engine generating 29,000 pounds of thrust, it achieves a maximum speed of Mach 2 and a combat radius of approximately 340 miles with external fuel tanks.
Its AN/APG-83 radar, derived from fifth-generation fighter technology, offers enhanced target detection and tracking, while the Viper Shield electronic warfare suite provides robust defense against enemy radar and missiles.
The aircraft can carry a diverse payload, including AIM-120 AMRAAM air-to-air missiles, AGM-88 HARM anti-radiation missiles, and Harpoon anti-ship missiles, making it ideal for air superiority, ground attack, and maritime operations.
With a flyaway cost of $70-80 million per unit, the F-16V is significantly cheaper than competitors like the F-35 [$110 million] or Eurofighter Typhoon [$120 million], offering Vietnam a cost-effective solution for modernizing its air force. Over 2,000 F-16s remain operational across 25 nations, including regional partners like Taiwan and Singapore, facilitating potential logistics and training synergies.
Vietnam’s current fighter fleet, centered on approximately 10 Su-27SK and 35 Su-30MK2 aircraft, reflects its longstanding dependence on Russian technology. The Su-27, introduced in the 1980s, is a twin-engine, heavy fighter designed for air superiority, with a maximum speed of Mach 2.35 and a range of 2,200 miles.
Its AL-31F engines, each producing 27,600 pounds of thrust, enable supermaneuverability, enhanced by thrust-vectoring nozzles. The Su-30MK2, a multirole derivative, incorporates upgraded avionics and can carry 17,600 pounds of ordnance, including R-77 air-to-air missiles, Kh-31 anti-ship missiles, and the R-37M, which has a range exceeding 200 miles.
These aircraft have been critical for patrolling Vietnam’s maritime borders, particularly in the South China Sea, where disputes with China over the Paracel and Spratly Islands persist. However, acquired in the 1990s and early 2000s, many are nearing the end of their 3,000-4,000-hour service lives, and maintenance has become increasingly problematic.
A 2025 report by the Defense Security Monitor highlighted that four Su-30s were grounded in 2024 due to expired warranties, with 10 more expected to become non-mission-capable by year’s end, exacerbated by sanctions on Russia and supply chain disruptions.
The Vietnam People’s Air Force has faced similar challenges with other Russian platforms. Its Su-22 Fitters, Soviet-era fighter-bombers from the 1980s, have suffered multiple crashes, underscoring the urgency of modernization.
A November 2024 incident involving a Russian Yak-130 trainer exploding mid-air in Binh Dinh province further highlighted safety concerns with aging equipment. These operational difficulties, combined with Russia’s prioritization of domestic needs amid the Ukraine conflict, have pushed Vietnam to explore Western alternatives.
The 19FortyFive report notes that Hanoi’s reluctance to pay advance fees to Russian suppliers like Rosoboronexport stems from concerns over unreliable service and sanctions risks, a sentiment echoed by Ukrainian defense industry representatives who have discussed Vietnam’s maintenance struggles.
The F-16V’s operational history offers a compelling case for Vietnam. During the 1991 Gulf War, F-16s flew over 13,500 sorties with a 95% mission success rate, conducting precision strikes and air-to-air engagements. In the 1999 Kosovo War, they logged 4,600 sorties, achieving a 92% success rate against Yugoslav defenses.
More recently, F-16s have supported operations in Syria, leveraging GPS-guided munitions like the Joint Direct Attack Munition for pinpoint accuracy. Taiwan’s F-16Vs, equipped with the same AN/APG-83 radar, have effectively countered Chinese air incursions, demonstrating their relevance in contested maritime environments.
By contrast, Russia’s Su-35, a potential alternative, has underperformed in Ukraine, with at least 12 losses reported by 2024, raising doubts about its effectiveness against modern air defenses. China’s J-20, a fifth-generation stealth fighter, poses a formidable threat with its PL-15 missiles, but its limited numbers—fewer than 200 in service—mitigate its regional dominance.
Transitioning to the F-16V would require Vietnam to overhaul its training, logistics, and infrastructure. Pilots accustomed to the analog cockpits of Su-27s and Su-30s would need 6-12 months of training on the F-16’s digital systems, likely at U.S. bases like Luke Air Force Base in Arizona.
Ground crews would require retraining to maintain the F-16’s advanced avionics, necessitating new simulators and maintenance facilities. The 19FortyFive report suggests that a deal for 24 F-16Vs could cost $4-6 billion, including aircraft, weapons, and support, a significant portion of Vietnam’s $6.2 billion defense budget in 2024.
Congressional approval remains a hurdle, as some U.S. lawmakers may raise concerns over Vietnam’s human rights record, a point emphasized by Ian Storey, a senior fellow at Singapore’s ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute. Additionally, Hanoi worries that advanced munitions like the AIM-120 AMRAAM may not be cleared for export, a concern informed by Ukraine’s experience with restricted F-16 capabilities.
Geopolitically, the potential F-16 acquisition reflects Vietnam’s strategic pivot toward the United States amid tensions with China. The South China Sea, where Beijing claims nearly 90% of the waters despite a 2016 international ruling against its assertions, remains a flashpoint.
Chinese coast guard vessels have repeatedly harassed Vietnamese fishermen near the Paracel Islands, with a notable incident in October 2024 involving assaults and seizures. The F-16V’s ability to conduct maritime patrols and precision strikes would enhance Vietnam’s deterrence capabilities.
Since the U.S. lifted its arms embargo, defense ties have deepened, marked by the delivery of five Beechcraft T-6 Texan II trainers in November 2024, the first U.S. military aircraft supplied to Vietnam. A Reuters report from April 10, 2025, noted that Vietnam’s interest in U.S. defense products, including aircraft, aims to address its trade surplus with the U.S., which prompted a 46% tariff announcement by the Trump administration.
Yet, Vietnam’s “three no’s” policy—no military alliances, no foreign bases, and no reliance on one country against another—complicates its alignment with Washington. Adopting F-16s could provoke China, which criticized similar U.S. arms sales to the Philippines in April 2025, arguing they “threaten regional peace”.
A 2023 Global Times report warned that an F-16 deal would “stir up troubles” in the region, reflecting Beijing’s sensitivity to U.S. military influence. Equally, a shift to U.S. platforms risks straining ties with Russia, which supplies 80% of Vietnam’s arms, including tanks, frigates, and S-300 air defense systems.
A February 2025 report suggested Hanoi may have agreed to an $8 billion Russian arms deal, potentially including Su-35s, indicating its reluctance to fully abandon Moscow.
Vietnam’s diversification strategy offers alternatives to the F-16V. Sweden’s Saab Gripen E/F, priced at $85 million per unit, provides comparable capabilities with lower maintenance costs and flexibility for non-U.S. weapons. France’s Dassault Rafale, a twin-engine fighter with the RBE2 AESA radar, excels in maritime operations but costs $120 million per unit.
India, a close partner, could supply modernized Su-30MKIs or the HAL Tejas, aligning with Vietnam’s Russian logistics but lacking the F-16V’s technological edge. Upgrading existing Su-30s with new radars and AL-41F1 engines, as India did in a $3.1 billion deal in 2024, could extend their service life by a decade at a lower cost, though it perpetuates dependence on Russia.
A hybrid approach, integrating F-16Vs for tactical missions and upgraded Su-30s for strategic roles, could balance capability and geopolitics, similar to India’s mixed fleet of Su-30s and Rafales.
Historically, Vietnam’s air force has navigated complex challenges. During the Vietnam War, its MiG-17s and MiG-21s, supported by Soviet and Chinese advisors, scored victories against U.S. F-4 Phantoms and F-105 Thunderchiefs, leveraging agility and ground-controlled intercepts.
By 1968, the Vietnam People’s Air Force claimed 244 U.S. aircraft shot down, losing 85 MiGs, a testament to its resilience despite being outnumbered. Post-war acquisitions of Su-27s and Su-30s in the 1990s bolstered its deterrence against China, particularly after the 1974 Paracel Islands seizure.
Today, the need for modernization is driven not only by aging equipment but also by China’s expanding fleet, including 50 J-20 stealth fighters and over 3,150 aircraft.
The potential F-16 deal, if confirmed, would mark a historic milestone in U.S.-Vietnam relations, transforming a former adversary into a strategic partner. It would enhance Hanoi’s ability to secure its maritime interests and align with U.S. allies like the Philippines, which approved a $5.58 billion F-16 purchase in April 2025.
However, the absence of official confirmation and the geopolitical sensitivities involved suggest caution. Vietnam’s leadership will likely weigh the benefits of advanced technology against the risks of alienating China and Russia while navigating domestic economic constraints.
The 19FortyFive report, while compelling, underscores the need for transparency from both governments to clarify the deal’s scope and implications. As Hanoi charts its path forward, the question remains: can it modernize its air force without destabilizing its delicate regional balancing.
Bulgarian military