Views: 1
At least two Tesla Cybertrucks armed with body-mounted machine guns have been deployed in Chechen units that are part of the Russian army.. A new video on the Internet showcases the Cybertrucks “patrolling” and firing at a drone. This video seems more like a marketing maneuver to highlight the performance and speed of Elon Musk’s vehicles rather than depicting real events on the front lines in Ukraine.
The first armed Tesla Cybertruck in Chechnya, driven by Ramzan Kadyrov, made its public debut on August 17, 2024. Kadyrov posted a video of himself driving the vehicle, featuring a mounted machine gun. This modification transformed the electric truck into a military resource aimed at supporting Russian forces in the Ukraine conflict.
Kadyrov expressed immense satisfaction with the Cybertruck, dubbing it the “Cyberbeast” for its remarkable speed, maneuverability, and durability. He lauded Tesla CEO Elon Musk for the advanced technology, noting that the vehicle would be deployed to the warzone in Ukraine to support his soldiers.
The Cybertruck is outfitted with a PKM machine gun, as evidenced by various videos and images showing Kadyrov beside the weapon. He highlighted the truck’s military capabilities, boasting about its “invulnerability” and the strategic advantages it could bring to the battlefield. Kadyrov also publicly thanked Elon Musk for the vehicle and extended an invitation to Musk to visit Chechnya as an honored guest. However, Musk later denied any personal involvement, clarifying that he had not gifted the truck to Kadyrov.
Meanwhile, Kadyrov sparked controversy by accusing Tesla CEO Elon Musk of remotely disabling a vehicle, a claim that Musk flatly denied, calling it outright false. While Musk publicly denied supplying any vehicle to Kadyrov, the Chechen leader stood firm on his allegations. Russian state media followed up with reports suggesting Kadyrov’s intentions to send more Cybertrucks to the conflict zone.
The latest Tesla trucks are painted green, matching the primary color of the Russian army’s camouflage. It’s uncertain if these represent two new Cybertrucks or if one of them is the repainted vehicle previously highlighted by Kadyrov in August.
One pressing question is how Tesla’s Cybertrucks found their way into the conflict zone, especially given the international sanctions that restrict Russia’s access to Western technology. Reports suggest that Chechen leader Ramzan Kadyrov managed to obtain these vehicles despite the sanctions. Kadyrov even claimed that one of the Cybertrucks was a “gift” from Elon Musk, a statement Musk has firmly denied.
This raises significant doubts about the legitimacy of Kadyrov’s claims. Furthermore, the murky details surrounding how these vehicles were acquired lead to suspicions of possible smuggling or other sanctions violations.
The effectiveness of vehicles like the Cybertruck in combat scenarios is still up for debate. Ramzan Kadyrov emphasizes their performance on the front lines, particularly pointing out their maneuverability and the protection they offer to their crews. Still, it is important to note that the Tesla Cybertruck was not designed with military use in mind. This raises legitimate concerns regarding its durability in intense combat conditions, where specialized armored vehicles are typically employed. Furthermore, technical issues like diminished battery life in harsh environments or the challenges of maintenance in the field could present significant drawbacks.
Elon Musk’s alleged “remote shutdown” of a Cybertruck also brings to light crucial cybersecurity questions and potential vulnerabilities in such connected vehicles. This incident demonstrates how remote access technology can intersect with military needs, potentially posing significant risks. If remote activation is possible, this could introduce new hybrid attack strategies where cyber warfare plays a pivotal role, impacting military vehicle operations.
The possibility of other electric or autonomous vehicles being deployed in military conflicts is another crucial area of inquiry. The trend toward automation and electrification in warfare is rapidly advancing, with drones and autonomous systems already demonstrating their effectiveness. Although vehicles like the Cybertruck aren’t typically seen in combat, this scenario underscores the potential role of electric vehicles in future conflicts and the necessity of tailoring technology to meet various military requirements.
On a larger scale, this situation carries significant geopolitical ramifications. Should it be confirmed that Tesla or other Western technology has been utilized by Russian forces, it could further strain relations between the West and Russia.
The sighting of a Tesla electric car in a conflict zone has already stirred discussions about how sanctions might be bypassed and the implications of corporate responsibility for large technology companies in military contexts. This incident also raises concerns about the effectiveness of international regulations in controlling the distribution of sensitive technologies in areas of conflict.
BULIGARIAN MILITARY