Calls for Kyiv to withdraw its troops for the part of the Donbas that it holds remain a key sticking point, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said, amid fast-paced negotiations and pressure from the United States for a deal to end Russia’s war on Ukraine.
The status of the Ukraine’s Russian-held Zaporizhzhya Nuclear Power Plant is another divisive issue, Zelenskyy told reporters late on December 11, after Ukrainian talks with both European backers and US officials. He also said that a cease-fire would be required if elections are to be held soon.
After the United States proposed a 28-point peace plan that critics say heavily favored Russia, Ukraine and European nations have been seeking changes that would leave a deal less lopsided and, crucially, ensure Ukrainian security against any future Russian attack. Kyiv submitted a 20-point plan earlier this week.
The Donbas And Beyond: The Territorial Barriers To Peace In Ukraine
“We sent the American team a revised version of the framework document we worked on. It includes 20 key points. This can be the foundation for everything. I’m waiting for feedback from America,” Zelenskyy told the gathering of more than 30 leaders of “coalition of the willing” countries.
While Russia has given few signs it’s ready to back away from long-standing demands, US and Ukrainian officials have been wrangling over the details. Zelenskyy said he had an “in-depth” discussion with Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Defense chief Pete Hegseth and White House special envoy Steve Witkoff.
The US is proposing that that Ukrainian troops withdraw from the well-fortified portion of the Donetsk region that they still control, Zelenskyy said, and “the compromise is supposedly that Russian troops will not enter” this area, where Washington calls for establishing a “free economic zone.”
“They do not know who will govern this territory,” Zelenskyy said, adding that Russia refers to it as a “demilitarized zone.” He also said that Ukrainians should have a say on any proposed territorial concessions, “whether through elections or a referendum.”
Following reports that US President Donald Trump set a December 25 deadline for Ukraine to accept the peace proposal, Zelenskyy said that Kyiv had not been given a firm deadline but that “I think they really wanted, or perhaps still want, to have a complete understanding of where we stand with this agreement by Christmas.”
Trump has been seeking to broker an end to Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine since he took office in January of this year, but has encountered high hurdles including Russian President Vladimir Putin’s rejection of calls for a cease-fire.
Trump said the United States may or may not participate in a planned meeting between senior Ukrainian, French, German, and British officials in Europe on December 13.
“We’ll see whether or not we attend the meeting,” Trump told reporters in the Oval Office. “We’ll be attending the meeting on Saturday in Europe if we think there’s a good chance. And we don’t want to waste a lot of time if we think it’s negative.”
“The president is extremely frustrated with both sides of this war, and he is sick of meetings just for the sake of meeting,” White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters.
Different Visions: Where The US And Europe Part Ways On Ukraine Peace
On elections, which the US has been pressing Ukraine to hold despite the fact that they are forbidden under martial law, Zelenskyy said on December 11 that a cease-fire would have to be in place.
Trump told Politico in an interview published on December 9 that “it’s time” to hold elections, and Zelenskyy said later that day — for the first time — that he would push parliament to draft legislation allowing for elections during martial law. He said a vote could follow in 60 to 90 days provided that security guarantees in place to make sure voting would be safe for Ukrainians.
Speaking to RFE/RL, Maryna Stavniychuk, a Ukrainian legal expert and former member of the Venice Commission, said that “specific issues as wartime and post-war elections are not regulated in any way by the electoral code of Ukraine. Therefore, a special set of legislative norms is needed, and this takes time.”
Kyiv must “look for options that, without violating the constitution or further undermining the legitimacy of the Ukrainian government, would allow elections to be held,” she added.
In specifying that cease-fire would be required, Zelenskyy may have been seeking to calling Russia’s bluff — Putin has baselessly charged that Zelenskyy is illegitimate because election were not held on schedule in 2024 — but also left any plan to hold elections vulnerable to rejection by Moscow unless a peace agreement is in place before voting is held.
(rferl)
